The fabric that binds together the essential driving force that purports the face of civility has the natural tendency to take on a contemporary and dialectical form of life. The overall degree of civility that has managed to saturate the public consciousness of the general population produces an appreciation factor that is firmly situated on the homogenized society’s ability to apply the definitive structure of the term. Abstract terminologies that paint a picture of society enable the immediate communities that discover them with the ability to apply a universal idea in a manner that works specifically toward the conditional realities that prevail on the ground level. In order to take a single step further we must first define what is conditional and universal within the confines of the generic social construct of civilization.
The terms of pragmatism and practical reconciliation suggest that the happenstance of one or more social developments that begin on the grassroots level only to influence the overall functionality of society demonstrates the fundamental pathology that goes into the conditioning of the social structure. The predication of progress should and must refer to a term that takes on a pathological nature. In order to traverse between points a, b, and c, we must put ourselves in a position where we can comprehend what the situational reality of society is at one given period of time and a protocol of applied action should shed light on the developmental force that proliferates through some sort of endeavoring aspiration of change.
It is not to suggest that in order to achieve some form of mode of progress, a purely endeavoring interest must be the single driving force that sees the development through; a specific medium of progress is virtually made possible when some form of technology is constructed in a desolate and backward society, but when the deliberation of its distribution is focused abundantly on the necessitations of the society it is the general population that demands it. Some shift on the societal level must take place in order to achieve some form of progress and the overall scale of its effectiveness must be measured and determined by the practical and pragmatic aftereffects that are distributed in a saturated manner.
The fundamental evaluation tool that can measure progress occurs through the forming of a dialectical abstraction once tone of its delivery is overburdened with statistics, facts, and figures. These three categories clarify the specifics behind any detailed subject matter that is abundantly complicated. The main reason why these specifics were introduced into our cognitive intuition and field of sight presents us with one medium that distinguishes the whole of humankind as a species that maintains a consciousness of intellectual prowess; however, if we begin to dwell on the specific configuration of fact and detail, we will eventually lose sight of the bigger picture of progress which compromises its total transgression into and from the mainstream. We have the general tendency to quantify things simply because we are not satisfied with the facts that create the reality of the immediate situation at hand.
A quantified fact, figure, or value does not necessarily mean that some form of forward thinking is behind the central base of advocacy that brings an advocated cause or interest to the attention of the general population. This is where profound mediums of retrogression occur and the aftereffects that descend on the rest of society take on an exponential form of life. Those that cause and create immense blunders hold the fate of civilization within their elite grasp, but the essence of this abstracted social responsibility means very little to the one figurehead who is preoccupied with the acceleration of their power and control. Let us then take a moment to focus on what the predication of homogenized social power means in a manner that is not too abstracted.
Those that retain a powerful abundance of power usually manipulate the resources, in some sort of physical or another superficial form which reinforces a sense of power simply because the resources in which they monopolize are redeemed by a concession of exponentially concentrated wealth or value. Whenever a form of intellectual capital is introduced it experiences a process that initiates it as a fundamental necessity to society which presents us with some form of modern growth and development; in order to achieve such a level of progression, a single standard must be behind the idea that prompts a social and economic order creating a unique culture onto itself. It must then be contested that a simple interpretation or sight of progress is there in a manner that is put forward in a non-discriminatory manner.
Notions and interpretations of progress can be metered by those who seek to manipulate the public consciousness of the masses. They as in those who can be classified as elites in the traditional sense, hold progress as a way of furthering their power and control over their respective population in a way that is virtually unbreakable. The conditional inhibition of progress, growth, and development can be morphed and created into a popular culture that purports only one medium of progress for the homogenized society and this is further reinforced by traditions of the elite economic norm; this is where the elite’s system of academic recruits in addition to all of its institutional variations come into play who assist with shaping and developing its policies.
When it comes to deciphering the complexity of human civilization we must absorb and comprehend the phases that lead to such progression in a way that essentially builds and reconstructs simultaneously. The human experience is largely a factor that depends on the empirical vision that builds comprehensive suspense whenever there is enough audacity to ask how and why. Similar to truth, the deliverance and deliberation of progress is produced based on the popularized overtones and undertones of society observed to condition the means in which the homogenized civilization comes into fruition. As addressed earlier in this reflective essay, we had mentioned that conditional realities influence the means and methodologies of progress and the basis of both is influenced by a conceptualized vision.
Anything and everything is conditional and the moment when the people are brought to accept something they can either progress or retrogress depending on their ability to pragmatically implement the underlying norm or norms into the heart of the mainstream. Populism that is saturated with progress that is legitimately redeemed on the grassroots level is achieved by socially sanctioned pragmatism. When the people are in a situation where they are only confronted by their inhibition to apply progress in a non-dialectical and un-metered fashion we will then retain the ability to empower our sovereign societies in a purely ecumenical manner.
-Image is Courtesy of http://www.oilcouncil.com-